Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Credibility gap cripples Adams

David McKittrick
Monday 19 February 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE REPUBLICANS

The state of play within the republican movement is a mystery - to the British and Irish governments, to the intelligence agencies, to outside observers, and even to many republicans, writes David McKittrick.

There appears to be an internal redefinition going on which involves a diminution of the status of the Sinn Fein president Gerry Adams and a return to the old violent ways. But the senior reaches of republicanism are a black box, and it is not clear whether new leaders are in the ascendancy, or whether opinion shifted during the course of the ceasefire.

Mr Adams was the horse backed by John Hume, the Dublin government and the Clinton administration, as the man who was open to a new non-violent course and who had the stature to deliver the republican movement. It seemed, with the IRA's "complete cessation" of August 1994, that he had done so.

Mr Adams represented what happened then as himself taking a political package to the IRA and persuading them to accept it. Some observers accepted that this was a reasonably accurate reflection of what happened; some said cynically that it was play-acting, arguing that Adams and associates such as Martin McGuinness were actually the leaders of the IRA as well as the leaders of Sinn Fein.

A year and a half on, it is impossible to say which version is nearer the truth. There is certainly a fair amount of IRA-Sinn Fein dual membership, and the two are bound together by family ties: a close relative of Mr Adams, for example, is said to be a senior militant. Many Sinn Fein leaders, including Mr Adams and Mr Guinness, have been to jail for IRA offences.

Yet the fact that Mr Adams was evidently taken by surprise by the Docklands bombing provides strong evidence that the leaderships of Sinn Fein and the IRA are not one seamless entity. Mr Adams shows no real sign of being in command of the IRA, for it has dealt grievous blows to his credibility.

In London, Dublin and Washington his status is being reassessed, and the conclusion is almost bound to be that he will command less respect. The IRA has thus harmed its political wing, and its foremost political advocate. The optimists will hope that Mr Adams and Sinn Fein have not lost the argument for a political approach; pessimists will fear that the IRA has concluded that politics are useless, and simply rededicated itself to another long war.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in