CPS loses second race bias tribunal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE CROWN Prosecution Service was found guilty of race discrimination and victimisation yesterday in a judgment likely to trigger an investigation by the Commission for Racial Equality.
The case, brought by a senior prosecutor, Maria Bamieh, is the second finding of racism against the CPS in eight months. The employment tribunal found that the CPS promotion board, in considering Mrs Bamieh's application for a management post, had conducted its "interviews and marking system in a subjective manner", had "abandoned guidelines", and marked her file with the words "extra care". They also found a superior had noted she had given poor advice in a rape case, whereas she had given no advice at all.
The commission's "legal committee" of commissioners is considering whether to take formal action against the CPS. The commission can order disclosure of documents and subpoena witnesses.
Ms Bamieh said some CPS lawyers were racist in the handling of cases. "There was one case mentioned during the tribunal where a lawyer had marked a black defendant's file `playing the race card'."
The CPS said it took the decision "very seriously" but needed more time to consider it to give a full response.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments