Cook rejects charge minister misled Lords
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ROBIN COOK yesterday denied one of his ministers had misled the House of Lords over the possible breach of a UN arms embargo on Sierra Leone.
The Foreign Secretary was replying to a claim by Michael Howard, the shadow foreign secretary, that Foreign Office Minister Baroness Symons had misled the Lords, and that a personal apology was required.
Mr Cook told BBC television's Breakfast with Frost that it was being suggested that because Lady Symons had been briefed on a possible customs investigation into arms dealing, she should have announced it to the Lords at the time. "I can't imagine anything more absurd in the very early stages of a customs inquiry," Mr Cook said.
"I mean, as if you should get up in the House and announce it. We're not going to get many successful investigations if we proceed in that way. She behaved impeccably."
Sir John Kerr, Head of the Diplomatic Service, last week admitted in evidence to a Commons committee that Lady Symons had been briefed last March on the customs investigation into alleged sanctions-busting. Last month Lady Symons appeared to tell the Lords she had not seen any papers about the inquiry.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments