Consumers: Bottled water labelled a `con'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Bottled water is "one of the greatest cons of the 20th century", due to it being "vastly overpriced" with little to "differentiate it from tap water" according to water companies.
Announcing the results of a review of the multi-million pound bottled water industry, Pamela Taylor, chief executive of the Water Companies Association (WCA), said yesterday that bottled water was "marketing's answer to the emperor's new clothes". David Alexander, chairman of the WCA's technical committee, said that while a litre of tap water cost on average 0.07p, a litre of bottled water costs 50p. "That's the same sort of price differential which exists between a Ford Escort car and a light aircraft," he said.
But the British Soft Drinks Association immediately hit back, describing its business as "highly successful". Robert Hayward, director general, said: "The growth is the result of consumer choice." Last year the UK market consumed 800 million litres of bottled water.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments