Commons watchdog to quiz Mandelson
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PETER MANDELSON is still facing censure from the Commons watchdog over his pounds 373,000 home loan from Geoffrey Robinson. Three complaints have been made about the former minister to the new Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, Elizabeth Filkin.
It will fuel demands by Labour MPs that the former trade and industry secretary should remain on the back benches for a lengthy period. It will also surprise many observers, because reports a week ago quoted "friends" of Mr Mandelson saying he had been reassured Commons rules did not require him to register the loan.
In fact, no such judgement has been made. He has asked for advice and been told he should register the interest, which he has done but an investigation on whether he broke the rules is under way.
Mr Mandelson and Mr Robinson, who was paymaster-general, resigned before Christmas when details of the loan became public.
Ms Filkin reports to MPs on the Standards and Privileges Committee in two weeks on the complaints about the loan. One is from the shadow trade secretary, John Redwood, and two from members of the public.
The complaints also address the question of whether Mr Mandelson should have registered flights he took in the jet of an American lingerie millionaire, Linda Wachner. He has said he did not need to declare them, because they were in a personal capacity and had nothing to do with his work. The rules say overseas visits must be registered if they relate in any way to membership of the Commons.
Mr Mandelson has also said the loan did not need to be registered because it was an arrangement between MPs. The Commons rules do not specifically mention such arrangements. In 1996 the then standards commissioner, Sir Gordon Downey, ruled that preferential treatment on loans to the Tory MP Roy Thomason should have been listed. MPs on the Standards and Privileges Committee will decide whether Mr Mandelson should be punished and how severely.
Ms Filkin has said that she wants ordinary people to feel they can approach her about MPs' conduct.
Last night Mr Redwood said he was sure Mr Mandelson had broken the rules. "Everyone believes that Mr Mandelson borrowed money on terms that are not normally available commercially, so surely the inquiry must find that he is guilty of failure to make a declaration.
"I also hope Mr Mandelson will explain how many other flights he received and why he did not think they were worth declaring," he said. A spokesman for Mr Mandelson said the commissioner's inquiry was old news and the impression that he had been cleared was the fault of misinterpretation by the media.
r Mr Mandelson could have received more than pounds 15,000 in severance pay after resigning from the Cabinet, the Government said last night.
The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, Stephen Byers, confirmed in a Commons written reply that under government rules his predecessor had received a pay-off of a quarter of his annual salary as a minister.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments