Commons toppers are old hat
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE COMMONS is to abolish the absurd rule that requires MPs making a point of order to wear a top hat, or other form of "cover", during a parliamentary vote.
The last occasion television viewers might have seen the practice was on Friday, when points of order were raised during votes on the Wild Mammals (Hunting with Dogs) Bill.
A report from the Commons Modernisation Committee said yesterday: "At present, if a Member seeks to raise a point of order during a division, he or she must speak `seated and covered'. In practice, this means that an opera hat which is kept at each end of the Chamber has to be produced and passed to the Member concerned.
"This particular practice has almost certainly brought the House into greater ridicule than almost any other, particularly since the advent of television. We do not believe that it can be allowed to continue."
The committee recommendation - which will be accepted by the House - is that in future, such points of order should either be made directly to the person in the chair, or, more publicly, from one of the benches close to the Speaker's chair, where the complainant can clearly be seen and heard.
The committee also recommended that another archaic practice, "spying strangers", to force a vote on clearing the Chamber of public and press, should be replaced by a more modern device to test the presence of a 40- strong quorum of MPs in the House.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments