Clinton scandal: Just one question is asked: Can he survive?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It was hour-by-hour, wall-to-wall, ear-to-ear media coverage of the presidential sex scandal over the weekend, with even the Pope's last Mass in Cuba and a major sporting highlight - the Superbowl - taking second and third billing. Yesterday morning television talkshows were dominated by one question: Can the President survive?
It seemed every Washington insider was called to testify for or against the President in the court of public opinion. They included past aides, including former spokesmen and women, George Stephanopoulos and Dee-Dee Myers, lawyers, and a sprinkling of veterans of the Watergate scandal, which cost Richard Nixon his presidency.
Opinion polls showed Bill Clinton's approval rating falling by 10 per cent since last week, and still dropping. Perhaps more telling was a shift in view about whether he was telling the truth and whether the affair mattered. In both cases, the balance of opinion appeared to have turned against him.
The Washington Post, first to break the story last Wednesday, devoted six pages of its main news section to it yesterday. It and the New York Times, which have strongly supported Mr Clinton's policies, used editorials to express concern about the state of the presidency and his "vulnerability".
However, Geneva Overholser, ombudsman of the Washington Post, used her weekly column to highlight readers' outraged calls and letters about what they saw as hype - at least at the start of the crisis. Their message, she said, was "We don't care about President Clinton's sex life.
"We knew that he played around ... We care that the nation is in good shape. We're tired of these constant investigations, these constant attempts to bring him down."
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments