Clinton opposes sales tax on Internet shopping
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PRESIDENT Bill Clinton yesterday came out on the side of the angels of technological progress and the free market in an increasingly bitter tussle between individual states and United States business, big and small. At issue is whether the growing number of Americans who buy goods over the Internet should be liable to pay sales tax on their purchases and if so, to whom.
Speaking in San Francisco, within shouting distance of "Silicon Valley", Mr Clinton called for a moratorium on all new taxation of goods and services sold over the Internet, and said it should apply to all taxes, federal, state or local. His reasoning was that nothing should be done to stifle the development of electronic commerce, which is still in its infancy.
This was Mr Clinton's first pronouncement on a subject that has insinuated itself almost unnoticed on to the legislative agenda, but has huge implications in terms of money and principles. Taken to its logical conclusion, Internet commerce not only poses questions about the highly devolved tax system, but also threatens the balance between the rights of states and the rights of the federal authorities.
Americans with access to the Internet - 20 million and growing - can buy an ever wider range of goods electronically. Initial reluctance to use the services, largely because of fear about credit card confidentiality, has faded, and the sector is seen as one of the biggest areas of potential growth.
A combination of factors makes the US particularly fertile ground for Internet shopping. People in rural areas have traditionally relied on mail order to obtain clothes and luxuries, and computers make it easier to compare prices. Then there is tax. States are allowed to impose a sales tax, and most do; this is added at the till and the rate varies from state to state. Sales via the Internet, however, are currently exempt, because the states cannot agree on who should levy the tax and how.
Late last year, a group of states banded together to propose reciprocal taxation on mail-order sales that would also apply to the Internet. This was abandoned after lobbying from business and consumers. This week, the subject came up again: the call for a tax on Internet sales was number one on the agenda of the twice-yearly state governors' meeting in Washington.
Legislation about to go before Congress would provide for a six-year moratorium on Internet sales taxes. Mr Clinton's intervention makes the bill more likely to pass. However, the states will not give up without a struggle.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments