Clinton likely to need charity
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The White House confirmed yesterday that a special defence fund may be set up to help President Bill Clinton to cope with legal bills of as much as dollars 1m ( pounds 670,000) which he is expected to run up defending his reputation from two different attacks.
Last week, Mr Clinton hired the Washington 'super-lawyer' Robert Bennett to defend him against the sexual harassment lawsuit filed by a former Arkansas state employee, Paula Jones. Mr Bennett will try to have the case dismissed before it is allowed to go to trial. If he fails, as is widely expected, the litigation could last more than a year.
Mr Bennett's services alone are rumoured to cost in the region of dollars 450 an hour. In addition to the Jones case, the President and the First Lady have for several months been defending themselves against allegations about their Whitewater real estate development in Arkansas, now being investigated by Robert Fiske, a special prosecutor. For Whitewater, the Clintons have retained another personal lawyer, David Kendall.
A White House official was asked yesterday whether the First Couple were having trouble keeping up with the bills. 'So far, no,' he replied. 'But there is now a civil action and the Fiske investigation. So they have legal costs on two different fronts.'
If a defence fund is set up, the White House could have nothing to do with it, and any donations would almost certainly have to be anonymous. Any suggestion that contributors could expect to receive presidential favours in return would raise further ethical questions.
Beyond the legal fees, there are the damages being sought by Ms Jones, who claims that Mr Clinton pressed her for oral sex during a May 1991 encounter in a Little Rock hotel room. Combined, the damages being sought on four different counts of harassment come to dollars 700,000.
Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton has accused the media of becoming 'the handmaiden of the political right' in their obsession with presidential wrong-doing. In an interview with Vanity Fair she described reporting of the Whitewater affair as a 'paranoiac, conspiracy-driven investigation'.
Sex and politics, page 19
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments