Chemists in talks on prescribing drugs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Chemists could be allowed to prescribe drugs and give advice to patients in new walk-in pharmacy clinics under plans being discussed between some of Britain's leading chemists' chains and Frank Dobson, the Secretary of State for Health.
The chains, who include leading high street names such as Boots and Superdrug, are interested in expanding the role of the pharmacists, who are highly trained but are prevented from carrying out a simple diagnosis.
One high street chain said it was looking at a "wider repertoire" of drugs, which could be sold over the counter by chemists without the customers paying the National Health Service prescription charge of pounds 5.65.
Some pharmacists also would like to be able to prescribe drugs in a limited areas, such as antibiotics, asthma, and skin conditions, while customers would be asked to see their doctors for anti-depressants and narcotics.
The talks could lead to "turf wars" with family doctors who will jealously guard their right to prescribe, and it could lead to criticism that the unique doctor-patient relationship is being harmed. But the GPs have been complaining for years that morale among family doctors is low because of the stress of the growing demands on their time, both in the surgery and with home visits.
However, the Government has received several reports suggesting that it would be more cost-effective to allow the chemists to broaden their role, which could also take some of the workload off the GPs.
Ministers have already granted nurses the right to prescribe drugs, under strict guidance from doctors, and allowing chemists to prescribe may be seen as an extension of that development. But ministers and the retailers also will have to face up to ethical questions, about chemists advising customers on drugs which they sell.
The pharmacists' leaders have been pressing for the role of the chemists to be expanded in return for higher fees. Mr Dobson will make it clear to the profession that it cannot expect any extra money from the taxpayer for giving advice to customers, but it could earn higher incomes through higher profits.
Welcoming the moves, one pharmacy chain said there were working parties which were drawing up protocols for the drugs which chemists may be able to prescribe and the limited number of conditions which they would be allowed to diagnose without the patient first visiting the GP.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments