Carrier prosecuted for 'putting lives in danger'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The first criminal prosecution against a scheduled airline for endangering the life of passengers is being brought by the Civil Aviation Authority, after a British Midland jet with 180 people on board made an emergency landing when both engines ran out of oil.
The incident last year, on a flight from East Midlands to Lanzarote, in the Canary Islands, occurred on the Boeing 737's first flight after routine maintenance at the airport. The flight, BD3141, on 23 February, had just reached cruising height when the pilots noticed low oil-pressure readings on both engines.
In a statement issued yesterday, the airline, Britain's second-largest scheduled carrier, said that the lack of oil pressure had been caused when "two components which had been removed from the aircraft were not correctly repositioned". It appears that two oil caps were not replaced, resulting in the loss of oil from both engines, which had smoke pouring out of them when the plane made an emergency landing at Luton. The 173 passengers and seven crew were unhurt.
British Midland is charged with two summonses under the Air Navigation Order 1989 for "negligent endangering" of both passengers on the aircraft and the public at large. The airline faces a maximum fine of pounds 2,000 on each count. A two-year prison sentence can be imposed, but as the prosecution is being brought against the airline rather than any individuals, it is not relevant in this case.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments