Care costs ruling upheld
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A council's right to sell a person's home in order to claw back nursing home fees was upheld in the High Court yesterday.
Despite the fact that David Harcombe had returned from Australia to care for his 84-year-old mother, the judge ruled that councils had a wide discretion to impose such charges "to ensure residents with assets are not maintained at public expense".Mrs Harcombe had wanted to leave her house to her children, including Mr Harcombe who lives there, but now much of the money from its sale will have to pay off the residential home fees. Local authorities must disregard the value of a property where a spouse or a relative who is either under 16, over 60 or disabled lives. But they are allowed to use their discretion in other cases.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments