Call to shelve nuclear plan
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Labour called yesterday for the planned pounds 2.6bn privatisation of the nuclear industry to be shelved following problems with the refuelling process and a subsequent shutdown at one of the most modern reactors, Heysham 2, in Lancashire.
A technical investigation has begun at Heysham and at Torness, an identical station, to establish whether there is a fundamental design fault.
John Battle, shadow energy spokesman, said: "The sale of nuclear does not add up economically and there now also seems to be a question over structural faults."
Mr Battle called for a halt to the privatisation process until the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate was able to give assurances there is no threat to public safety. The sale, scheduled to take place this summer, is already dogged by arguments over the financial structure of the industry between the Government and British Energy, the company to be privatised.
British Energy said the problem "really is a minor one" and the decision to shut Heysham 2 was taken voluntarily with no pressure from the NII.
The problem at Heysham 2 occurred as fuel rods were loaded into the reactor while it was still running. This "on-load" refuelling enhances performance of the reactors and could add millions of pounds to the profits of the privatised company. It is not yet clear whether the fault is a one-off.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments