Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Call for climbers to pay insurance

Thursday 22 February 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MPs are to investigate whether climbers should be forced to take out compulsory insurance to cover the cost of being rescued. The Scottish Affairs Committee will examine the idea of setting up a system similar to other parts of Europe, where walkers and climbers pay for being rescued through compulsory insurance policies.

But rescue teams and sports enthusiasts feel the present British system works well.

The cost of paying for rescues has been the focus of debate for years, particularly as last year brought record call-outs for many mountain rescue teams.

The RAF, which provides helicopters and mountain rescue teams, supports the system as it stands. A spokesman said: "We have no quibble with the present system because where life is in danger there is no question of cost."

The Scottish Sports Council said it would strongly oppose compulsory insurance, claiming the cost of policing such a scheme would be greater than present operational costs.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in