Woolies rejects Apax price range as `unacceptable'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WOOLWORTHS REFUSED to grant Apax Partners access to its books yesterday after the private equity group pitched a lowball takeover proposal worth between 50 to 55p per share.
The retailer, which rushed out its post-Christmas trading statement after sales stalled, said the indicative proposal was laced with pre-conditions. It dismissed the offer just hours after receiving it on the grounds that the range indicated failed to provide "acceptable value or certainty" to warrant further talks. Apax's proposed range valued its target at between pounds 718m and pounds 790m.
Shares in Woolworths, which updated the City after the stock market closed yesterday, reached 48p - well below the 60p-a-share level many analysts thought a bidder would have to pay. Before Christmas, its shares traded at about 46p.
Analysts said Woolworths' rejection could flush out other bidders although few observers could see the rationale for a private equity bid for a company that lacks a freehold estate. Asda and Tesco are among the mooted trade buyers.
Nick Bubb, at Evolution Securities, said: "Woolworths' management was obviously of the view that the company is worth more. So either they have got to justify that with a punchy recovery plan or they must think there is another party waiting to come in. I still think it is in play."
Richard Ratner, at Seymour Pierce, said: "The company is now ... in play. However, the pressure is now on the management to perform."
It took Woolworths' board, headed by Gerald Corbett, just one meeting to reject Apax's proposal, which it received on Monday. The company said: "The board, with its advisers, has considered this indicative proposal carefully. It has concluded that the range indicated does not provide acceptable value or certainty to justify entering detailed discussions with Apax."
The private equity group demanded full access to Woolworths' financial and trading information as part of its pre-conditions. Apax declined to comment on its intentions, but it has ruled out making a hostile approach. It had lined up Robert Dyas' former executive team, led by Robert Pedder and Brent Wilkinson, to head its bid approach.
Woolworths is anxious to avoid repeating the upheaval that preceded its demerger in 2001, when Kingfisher attempted to find a buyer. Privately, it feels it has suffered unduly from being the first retailer to heed the City regulator's edict that companies had to confess promptly to poor sales over Christmas. Its shares lost about one-fifth of their value after it brought forward its trading statement.
Although Trevor Bish-Jones, the chief executive, has improved operating margins, he has failed to grow the top line. Underlying sales over Christmas were flat.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments