Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Widowswindfall adds to siege of mutuals

Clare Francis
Saturday 25 December 1999 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Christmas has come early for members of Scottish Widows. Following last week's overwhelming vote in favour of a takeover by Lloyds TSB, the insurer will be paying out windfalls next June worth an average of pounds 5,600 to 1.6 million investors

All members who took out a with-profits policy before 22 June this year will receive a fixed sum of pounds 500. Those who took out policies before 31 December 1998 will enjoy further payouts calculated on the amount they have invested and the length of time they have held their policies. An estimated 900,000 will be eligible for this variable compensation, with a few people receiving sums amounting to more than pounds 100,000.

But these terms have been surrounded by controversy. Some 400,000 members will not receive a windfall because, although they have Scottish Widows policies, they were issued by subsidiary companies such as fund management firms or the banking arm of the company. Those who have Scottish Widow PEPs, unit trusts, credit cards or deposit accounts will get nothing.

News of the takeover is another nail in the coffin for mutual societies, which have come under siege from carpetbaggers in recent months. The Government has recognised the problem; it recently introduced legislation requiring 500 signatures from members before a demutualisation vote can take place, rather than the previous 50. But the huge support given by Scottish Widows members to the demutualisation proposal suggests that the trend is set to continue.

Kenneth Murray, chief executive of Murray Financial, a company established to take over building societies and turn them into internet banks, says: "Societies are realising that their futures are better served by conversion than remaining as a mutual."

The Skipton, Chelsea and Portman building societies are all facing demutualisation votes in the new year, and there are rumours that Scottish Life could be targeted by a bank wanting a stake in the life assurance sector. Possible bids could come from foreign as well as British banks. Meanwhile, the likes of the Halifax and Prudential, which have already bought out smaller building societies, should not not be ruled out of further bids.

Despite predictions that more demutualisations will follow, the willingness of Scottish Widows to give up its 184-year history as a mutual society is not shared by everyone.

Some building societies are fighting back. For example, Leek United rejected a hostile takeover bid earlier this month.

Meanwhile, the Cheshire Building Society has also reaffirmed its determination to remain independent, claiming that mutuality is providing clear benefits for its members. This has been demonstrated as loyalty rates for mortgage borrowers who have been with the society for more than five years have established the Cheshire in second place in the latest "Best Buy" table from Moneyfacts. The society also offers a Members' Loyalty Bond for investors of two years' standing.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in