Why De La Rue wants Portals
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.DE LA RUE'S takeover approach to Portals, confirmed yesterday, was prompted by the growing advantage paper makers hold over printers in the war against counterfeiters, writes Paul Durman.
Technological advances have made it easier to turn out passable duplicates of banknotes printed by De La Rue and other security printers. It is harder to replicate the watermarks, metal strips and other devices installed during the paper-making process.
Jeremy Marshall, De La Rue's chief executive, said ownership of Portals would allow printing and security devices to be combined. 'You can only organise that properly if you are in control of both.'
Confirmation of De La Rue's approach saw another 40p rise in Portals' shares to 805p. De La Rue shares slipped from 878p to 857p.
Bottom Line, page 26
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments