Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Whitbread sale opposed

Dan Gledhill
Saturday 12 June 1999 19:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PUNCH TAVERNS will urge the Office of Fair Trading this week to block the disposal of Whitbread's breweries.

The move, backed by other pub owners concerned about the increasing concentration of brewing interests, is the latest in the bitter pounds 2.6bn battle for control of Allied Domecq's pub estate .

Whitbread has so far received five expressions of interest for the breweries in Gwent, Manchester and Preston. But Hugh Osmond, who runs privately owned Punch, believes that Whitbread's plan would concentrate Britain's brewing capacity in too few hands. Punch has joined forces with other pub companies in voicing concern that the remaining brewers would have the power to restrict choice by dictating supply terms to their customers.

Whitbread is obliged by the 1989 Beer Orders to dispose of its three breweries if its purchase of Allied's 3,600-strong estate is to get the go-ahead. The Orders, which sought to limit the power of big brewers, restricts the number of pubs that the likes of Whitbread are allowed to own if they continue brewing.

The Orders came into force when Britain's beer market was controlled by six brewers. However, the ranks of dominant brewers could dwindle to number only Scottish & Newcastle, Bass and Carlsberg-Tetley after Whitbread's exit. The breweries are responsible for the Bodington's, Heineken and Stella Artois brands.

Mr Osmond is concerned that Whitbread will have to put in place a restrictive supply agreement with its pubs to ensure that the breweries remain viable, in apparent contravention of the Beer Orders.

The opposition of Mr Osmond and others echoes criticism by the Campaign for Real Ale of Whitbread's agreement to buy the pubs, which will leave Allied free to develop its spirits business.

Mr Osmond's submission to the OFT will form part of a concerted attack on Whitbread as Punch finalises its bid for the Allied estate. He has been an outspoken critic of the agreement with Whitbread, which came after Allied rebuffed his own attempts to buy the pubs.

Mr Osmond has now obtained a copy of the Carlsberg-Tetley supply agreement, which is considered critical to determining the value of the Allied estate. Another potential obstacle to a Punch bid, the capital gains tax liability of a cash bid for the pubs, appears to have been removed after Goldman Sachs, the investment bank advising Allied, said it was satisfied with Punch's tax arrangements.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in