Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Wellcome hit by drug block

Tom Stevenson
Friday 13 January 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The US Food and Drug Administration dealt the drugs giant Wellcome an unexpected blow yesterday, withholding approval for over-the-counter sales of the anti-viral drug Zovirax.

Analysts said approval could have doubled sales of the drug, which are forecast to rise to almost £400m in the US. On a day when the rest of the pharmaceutical sector posted rises, Wellcome's shares closed 15p lower at 664p.

The announcement is a serious blow to Britain's third-largest drugs company because Zovirax, used to treat genital herpes and shingles, is due to lose its patent protection at the end of 1997. Traditionally the loss of protection savages sales of drugs. SmithKline Beecham recently lost its patent on the ulcer treatment Tagamet and saw sales fall by three-quarters.

With the cost of developing drugs so high, companies depend on selling generic versions after patents expire and other companies can compete with similar formulations.

Wellcome said it remained committed to making Zovirax an OTC product and planned to reopen talks with the FDA.

Refusal to grant approval is understood to have hinged on two issues - the threat of the herpes virus developing resistance to the drug as a result of accidental under-prescription, and worries about misdiagnosis by first-time sufferers from other sexually transmitted diseases.

Worries about herpes developing resistance are significant because of the extent to which the virus has infected the US population. Some estimates are that 55 million Americans suffer from genital herpes.

Analysts say US sales of Zovirax represent just under 20 per cent of group turnover. Because of its relatively high return, however, it could contribute a quarter of total profits.

One of Wellcome's most successful drugs, Zovirax is thought to have accounted for half the rise in prescription drug sales in 1994. When its monopoly position expires in 1997 profits could fall by £100m, according to some estimates, and earnings per share could even fall, reversing the rising trend that characterised the pharmaceutical industry's boom years in the 1980s.

Wellcome's shares have been in retreat for three years since shortly before its former parent, the Wellcome Trust, sold a second tranche of shares to the public. In January 1992 the shares reached 1,128p, having been floated off at 120p in 1986.

The shares are less well-rated than the other large drug stocks, trading on a prospective p/e of 12.3 compared with more than 14 for Glaxo, SmithKline Beecham and Zeneca.

Outlook, this page

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in