Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Weinstock departs with an attack on Greenbury reforms

Patrick Tooher
Friday 06 September 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Lord Weinstock yesterday delivered a typically single-minded attack on the latest trends in corporate governance as he handed over the reins of GEC, the defence and electronics giant, to former Lucas chief executive George Simpson after 33 years at the helm.

In his farewell speech to shareholders at the company's annual meeting, Lord Weinstock rounded on aspects of the Greenbury and Cadbury committees set up to curb excesses in company boardrooms. "[They] are not engraved in stone and brought down from Mount Sinai," he said.

"I don't like non-executives being set against executives as Cadbury seems to imply. It destroys the cohesion of the board. They should be supported by non-executives, not held in suspicion by them.

"One or two of the Greenbury provisions are a bit peculiar," he continued. "They are used as an excuse to virtually persecute directors.

"Trust must exist in a democratic capitalist society between shareholders and the people who run their company. The last few years have seen examples of greed and exploitation of privileges ... but we have been more frugal than any company."

Lord Weinstock was speaking after shareholders heard Lord Prior apologise to Mr Simpson for causing him "acute embarrassment" over the way GEC dealt with his controversial pay and options package potentially worth up to pounds 1.5m a year.

"I don't think we have handled this matter very well and I regret it very much," Lord Prior said.

Mr Simpson's appointment to the board was overwhelmingly approved by shareholders. Details of his original remuneration threatened to spark a revolt among institutional investors who claimed the performance threshold needed to trigger share option and incentive awards were too low.

But earlier this week, GEC amended the terms and conditions, which are now based on top quartile share performance as measured against the FT- SE 100 index.

Mr Simpson will receive an annual salary of pounds 600,000 plus annual pension contributions of pounds 300,000 and a one-off pounds 500,000 payment in compensation for what he would have received at Lucas had he stayed with the company.

His initial three-year contract is allowed under the Greenbury code, but this will revert to a one-year contract to comply with current codes of best practice.

Lord Prior paid tribute to Lord Weinstock, saying that he had become a "legendary figure" in British industry during his time at GEC.

"No other industrialist in the whole of the post-war period has made a comparable contribution to the survival and success of British industry," Lord Prior said.

Clearly moved, Lord Weinstock sat with his head in his hands as Lord Prior also paid tribute to Lord Weinstock's son, Simon, who died of cancer earlier this year.

Lord Weinstock received a standing ovation after his speech in which he made clear that he saw Mr Simpson as a force for continuity and not change.

Leadership of GEC, he said, took "teams of people who trust each other and can work together - putting ego behind them".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in