Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Watmoughs accuses bidder of false claims

Chris Godsmark
Sunday 11 January 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Watmoughs, the printing group fighting off a pounds 188m hostile takeover bid by rival Quebecor, yesterday intensified the war of words with its Canadian suitor, accusing the bidder of making false and contradictory claims.

In the third defence document released by Watmoughs, and the second sent to its investors in the space of a week, the company said Quebecor had misrepresented the UK group's prospects.

Sir Derek Birkin, Watmoughs chairman, insisted the company had invested heavily in new technology, rubishing Quebecor's claim that it needed to buy state-of-the-art equipment. Watmoughs also pointed to its position in the consumer magazine market with the contract to print Hello magazine. Quebecor had claimed the company did not print any top 10 weekly consumer titles.

Sir Derek warned shareholders that Quebecor's bid arguments should be treated with "extreme scepticism," though the UK company said it had not lodged a complaint about the tactics with the Takeover Panel.

The defence document added that Watmoughs' operating profit margins, at 12.1 per cent, were higher than the 8.8 per cent achieved by Quebecor. "Shareholders should not be deluded by Quebecor's cavalier generalisations and factually inaccurate and contradictory statements," added Sir Derek.

Quebecor responded by saying that Watmoughs was fast becoming its own best customer, given the number of defence documents it had released. "They should consider saving trees instead," said a spokesman, who continued: "One of the few documents they haven't quoted from is the Holy Bible. If shareholders don't like our offer then they don't have to accept it."

Watmoughs shares closed unchanged on Friday at 279.5p, 22.5p higher than Quebecor's bid. Analysts expect the Canadian group to raise its offer before the extended bid deadline of 22 January

- Chris Godsmark

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in