Wates plans to build new City skyscraper
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Plans to build a second tall tower in the City of London have been submitted by Wates City, the quoted property group, writes Patrick Tooher.
The scheme involves redeveloping the Britannic Tower in Moorgate, bought earlier this year for pounds 30m from British Petroleum, to create a new glass and steel building 666 feet high - slightly smaller than the Canary Wharf tower in London's Docklands.
It would contain 37 floors of office space, street-level shops and would be topped off with what would be London's highest restaurant.
Designed by the Spanish architect Santiago Calatrava, the tower, called City Point, would be smaller than the controversial pounds 400m Millennium project designed by Sir Norman Foster which has yet to win local planning approval.
Construction costs for Wates's 636,000 sq ft scheme are estimated to be pounds 100m and joint managing director Rodney Coulton admits funding is still at an early stage.
"Obviously the scheme will not be pursued until we have satisfactory pre-letting and financing arrangements in place," he said.
"Clearly we will always have the option to redevelop on the rather conservative set of assumptions upon which we acquired the site, which would create less space in a good building but at a lower cost."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments