Water shares fall as rules are tightened
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SHARES in water companies fell sharply yesterday after the industry regulator ordered a 17 per cent reduction in leakage rates over the next two years.
Ian Byatt, the director general of the water regulator Ofwat, said that the water saved would be enough to supply four million people.
The industry will be required to reduce leakage rates by 9 per cent in the current year and by a further 8 per cent in 1999-2000, although some suppliers have been set tougher targets.
Thames Water has been told to reduce leaks by 26 per cent over the two- year period to 665 megalitres a day.
Shares in the company fell by more than 3 per cent from 1085p to 1050p.
Severn Trent, which has been told to cut leaks by 14 per cent, saw its shares fall from 1022 to 1014p, while shares in Anglian, which has to achieve a 17 per cent cut, fell 18p to close at 845p.
The industry had argued that it was now close to its "economic" leakage rate - the level at which it becomes cheaper to develop new sources of supply than to continue plugging leaks in the network.
But Mr Byatt has rejected these arguments. Mr Byatt has only accepted the economic leakage assesssments of six out of the 27 water companies as the basis for assessing their new reduction targets.
The regulator added that all the water companies needed to produce new assessments of their economic levels of leakage before they submit their draft business plans next year.
These will be factored into the new price limits Mr Byatt will set for the five-year period from 2000.
Mr Byatt also said he was disappointed at the efforts of the water companies to promote water efficiency and quantify the level of savings such initiatives could deliver.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments