Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Water pledges draw fire all round

Michael Harrison
Wednesday 08 January 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The privatised water industry came under a fresh barrage of criticism yesterday despite pledging to end hosepipe bans and share future efficiency gains with customers through lower bills or better services.

The pledges formed the centre-piece of a "fightback" by nine of the 10 water companies against the wave of adverse publicity since privatisation seven years ago.

Denying that the campaign was motivated by a fear of Labour's windfall tax, the nine publicly committed themselves to "never again" subjecting their 50 million customers to rota cuts or standpipes in the street.

Other pledges included an end to the discharge of untreated sewage into rivers and the sea, improved compensation schemes for customers and a drive to reduce leakage rates.

However, the campaign backfired almost immediately after the companies were unable to give firm dates for when hosepipe bans would become a thing of the past or detail how efficiency gains would be divided between customers and shareholders.

Frank Dobson, Labour's environment spokesman, said the pledges fell "far short of what the next Labour government will require them to do" and re-iterated the party's intention of imposing a windfall tax on the privatised utilities.

The Government's Environment Agency, meanwhile, said the water industry's record on pollution since privatisation had not been good, adding that it wanted to see more detail of how it planned to turn "its vision into reality" and the time-scales involved.

Consumer watchdogs also voiced scepticism. Elizabeth Monck, chairwoman of the Thames customer services committee of Ofwat, criticised the absence of any detailed breakdown of how excess profits would be shared between customers and shareholders: "Substantial profits have been made since privatisation and customers are looking for a much clearer message about where the benefits are coming to them."

John Green, managing director of Anglian Water and chairman of the Water Services Association, which is co-ordinating the initiative, insisted the pledges went well beyond the statutory requirements contained in the water companies' licences. He was unable to give an commitment, however, that the pledges would stand if Labour got in and levied its windfall tax.

The nine companies backing the initiative are Anglian, North West Water, Welsh Water, Northumbrian, Severn Trent, Southern Water, South West Water, Thames and Yorkshire.

However, only four of these - Northumbrian, Severn Trent, North West and Welsh - were able to pledge publicly yesterday that they would never again enforce hosepipe bans. Their commitment to end discharges of untreated sewage was equally patchy, with some companies refusing to give a time- scale.

Brian Duckworth, managing director of Severn Trent, said: "The water industry has come in for a lot of criticism and we believe that some of this is justified. Some things have gone wrong but far more is going right for the industry."

Comment, page 17

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in