Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Water groups defy price cut demand

Andrew Verity
Friday 09 April 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THREE of the UK's biggest water companies yesterday threw down the gauntlet in their battle with the water regulator, Ofwat, over the amount they can charge customers for the next five years. Only one, Thames Water, is proposing a cut in bills.

Thames, the country's largest water and sewerage company, proposed cutting bills by 5 per cent in the year 2000, taking pounds 10 off the average bill of pounds 205. But it wants bills to rise by 2.5 per cent above inflation in the succeeding four years.

Scottish Power, owner of Southern Water, brushed aside demands for a cut, proposing to raise bills 3.5 per cent next year and 3 per cent above inflation until 2005. Bristol Water wants an initial rise in real terms of 1.5 per cent next year and 1 per cent each year until 2005.

The proposals are in stark contrast to demands for hefty price cuts from Ian Byatt, director-general of Ofwat, last October. In Southern's case, he wanted a 17.5 per cent price cut next year.

Nigel Hawkins, utilities analyst at Williams de Broe, said: "There's a gap between the proposals of Ofwat and Thames Water, but with Scottish Power it's more like a chasm."

All water companies have been told to hand Ofwat their proposals for cutting bills while paying out for major environmental improvements demanded by the Government.

"Our plan will provide greater environmental improvements and deliver a stable price regime over the entire price control period in line with our customers' preferences," said Ian Russell, chairman of Southern Water.

Mr Byatt has indicated he is likely to soften his proposals because of the scale of investment the water companies will have to make under the Government's environmental programme.

Thames Water is planning to invest pounds 2.5bn to enhance the taste and appearance of drinking water, and to improve effluence flowing into shallow rivers.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in