Water firms may face fines of 30% of turnover
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE WATER regulator, Ian Byatt, yesterday warned the heads of Britain's water companies that they could face fines of up to 30 per cent of turnover if they obstruct efforts to increase competition from next year.
In a letter to the managing directors of all 28 water companies, Mr Byatt said that the introduction of the Competition Act from 1 March next year would open up the scope for "common carriage" - where one supplier can use another's network to supply customers inside their monopoly area.
Mr Byatt said that if any company refused unreasonably to share its infrastructure or imposed unreasonable terms for access, it could amount to abuse of a dominant position.
"If I find that a company has infringed the Act, I will direct it to change its conduct and, if appropriate, impose financial penalties," wrote the regulator. Companies can be fined 10 per cent of turnover for a period of three years.
Mr Byatt also said that companies would have to charge for common carriage in a way that reflected the costs of using the system.
Additional costs of connecting to the network or strengthening the network to handle increased volumes of water, would have to be borne by the new entrant.
But incumbent operators should not use this as an excuse to make new entrants pay for improvements that would have taken place anyway.
Mr Byatt has ordered each company to give a transparent breakdown of its costs and how it plans to implement common carriage before the 1 March deadline for the new Competition Act.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments