Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Washington tax jolt for Barclays

Larry Black
Thursday 20 January 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

NEW YORK - Washington has formally thrown its weight behind a controversial California tax on multinational corporations, withdrawing its support for a legal challenge led by Barclays Bank, writes Larry Black.

The US Justice Department, with the backing of the Clinton administration, urged the Supreme Court to reject claims by Barclays and dozens of foreign corporations that they were unfairly obliged to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to California in the early 1980s. Under the state's unitary tax code system, which clashes with both international tax law and Washington's own way of treating multinationals, foreign companies are assessed for taxes based on their worldwide profits rather than the earnings of their California-based divisions.

Earlier US administrations had backed the Barclays challenge, terming the California law an 'irritant' to international commerce. But President Clinton, courting California voters in the election two years ago, campaigned on a pledge to back the cash-strapped state in the dispute. The Supreme Court is expected to hear the case in June.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in