Warning on mixing tax and benefits
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Integration of the tax and benefit systems, a central part of the new Government's welfare to work programme, carries a number of significant drawbacks according to a report from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
In a new analysis published today, the Foundation concludes that although these plans are feasible, they are not necessary to achieve the Government's objectives and would involve significant costs.
The analysis, conducted by Pamela Meadows of the Policy Studies Institute, lists these costs as:
r a return to family as the unit of tax assessment rather than the individual, removing the privacy introduced with separate assessment;
r the completion of tax returns by all taxpayers (only 25 per cent are required to do so at present);
r the passing on of labour costs from some employers to the taxpayer, with increased scope for fraud;
r the creation of some losers from a simplification in Family Credit arrangements and from loss of benefits in kind, such as free school meals.
Reform of the tax and benefit system is thought necessary by ministers because loss of benefit for those coming into the workforce often offsets earnings.
Linking the benefit and tax systems would improve the lot of the small group of low-income earners who do not claim Family Credit, the report says. But this improvement would only come about at the cost of a large increase in complexity and disruption for others.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments