Ward 'spoke of advice fee'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THOMAS WARD, the former Guinness director accused of stealing pounds 5.2m from the company, told a colleague that he would be taking a fee of pounds 250,000 or dollars 250,000 for advice given during Guinness' bid for Distillers in 1986, a court heard yesterday.
Mr Ward, 53, an American lawyer, is accused of theft, false accounting and dishonestly procuring the execution of a valuable security. He maintains that pounds 5.2m paid by Guinness into his company, Marketing and Acquisitions Consultants, based in the Channel Islands, was a legitimately earned success fee.
Sir Charles Fraser, a solicitor who practised in Edinburgh before retiring last year, and a fellow adviser on the pounds 2.7bn bid, said he remembered talking to Mr Ward about his fees but could not remember whether the 250,000 figure was in pounds or dollars.
Sir Charles told the court at the Old Bailey that he thought Mr Ward deserved a better reward than either pounds 250,000 or dollars 250,000 for the 'crucial' work he had put into the bid, which at the time was close to success. 'I said (to Mr Ward) it was not nearly enough considering he had been away from home for goodness knows how long,' Sir Charles said. He said Mr Ward replied 'something like: 'That is the way I operate'.'
Earlier, Alan Bailey, group chief accountant at Guinness at the time of the bid, told the jury he understood from a meeting with Mr Ward that the pounds 5.2m payment was for work on US distributor rights and trademarks.
He said he thought it was work carried out on Mr Ward's behalf. 'For an amount of that size I would expect it was payment for other people,' he said.
Mr Bailey agreed with Andrew Trollope QC, for the defence, that Olivier Roux, former finance director of Guinness, had said to him that in America a payment of the size allegedly made to Mr Ward would constitute a 'reasonable success fee' on a large bid.
The trial continues tomorrow.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments