Ward Holdings dives 10%
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SHARES IN Ward Holdings, the Kent-based housebuilder, slumped nearly 10 per cent yesterday despite a return to profitability, writes Robert Cole.
Ward made pre-tax profits of pounds 347,000 for the six-month period ended 30 April, compared with a loss of pounds 1.8m in 1992.
But sentiment turned against Ward yesterday because the company passed its dividend. Shareholders have received nothing since an interim payment in 1991.
Ward's shares also suffered following a downbeat statement on current trading by chairman Denis Ward. He said profit margins were squeezed because the market was flush with both new houses and properties that had been repossessed.
'Trading conditions in the South-east of England housing market continue to be depressed and this area remains one of the most difficult in the country from which to operate,' he said.
Earnings per share were 0.7p against losses last time of 2.3p. Shares fell 5p to 47p. Five years ago they were trading at more than 150p.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments