Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Virgin ads anger financial advisers

Nic Cicutti
Wednesday 28 August 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

A row has broken out between Virgin Direct, the financial services firm owned by cola-to-airline tycoon Richard Branson, and independent financial advisers, who claim they are being unfairly vilified in Virgin's advertisements.

IFA Promotion, a body which promotes the use of independent advisers, has written to the Advertising Standards Authority, complaining that Virgin's ads breach the ASA code of practice. In particular, IFA Promotion objects to Virgin's claims that it gives "value for money" because it has nothing to do with salesmen or commissions.

Robert Browne-Clayton, the IFA body's chief executive, said: "We are unhappy about a number of claims made in Virgin Direct's advertising. However, the crux of our argument is that people who are considering life insurance need advice."

Martin Campbell, product development manager at Virgin Direct, said: "It is ironic that we should be attacked by IFA Promotion when we give its number to hundreds of customers who need advice about a product in an area we do not cover.

"Its attack on us is out of date. We have moved away from the argument about commissions and on to more positive arguments about our products. The point we have been trying to make is that if the insurance industry did its job properly millions of people would be better protected than they are today."

The ASA was unavailable for comment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in