View from City Road: Watchdog for the watchdogs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Who needs another layer of regulation? The National Consumer Council, a quango funded by the Department of Trade and Industry, has suggested creating yet another supervisory body, this time to oversee the various financial ombudsmen. The idea is that consumer representatives would be in the majority, which sounds like more jobs for lobbyists.
The ombudsmen were put in, quite rightly, to provide an impartial view on the treatment meted out to customers by banks, building societies, insurance companies and others.
They work in different ways but most are overseen by a council including representatives of the public. The Building Societies Ombudsman's council, for instance, has an independent chairman, three building society representatives, and four outsiders.
It is difficult to see how an umbrella organisation looking over the shoulders of this council would necessarily provide any better safeguards. Worse, there is a danger it would confuse consumers, already uncertain how to find their way round the regulatory jungle.
The NCC's suggestion that ombudsmen should publish the names of frequent offenders is no less controversial. It believes this would increase public awareness of the ombudsman scheme.
It could, however, lead to league tables of 'good' and 'bad' firms. But just as there is doubt about exactly what league tables of schools' exam performance say about the quality of schools, reports of clashes with the ombudsmen could also be misleading. Much would depend on the complaints procedures within firms. The NCC should think again.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments