View from City Road: Unpopular move at Wellcome
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It is perhaps fortunate that Wellcome chose Sir Anthony Tennant as its deputy chairman. After years of shrugging off criticism of his combined chairman and chief executive role at Guinness, he is hardly likely to quibble now that the drugs company has decided to give John Robb the chairman's job in addition to his chief executive post.
Shareholders, however, have no such qualms. A number of institutions have already expressed their displeasure to the Wellcome board. Standard Life has gone further; it wants assurances that the roles will be split again as soon as possible.
It is likely to be disappointed. Mr Robb is still four years from retirement and shows no sign of wishing to give up as chief executive. Equally, however, he is unlikely to want to revert to working under an outside chairman, having just won the top post.
Wellcome is not breaking any rules. The Cadbury guidelines do recommend splitting the roles, but they also accept that strong non- executives - Wellcome has five, including Sir Anthony - can provide adequate checks and balances. Wellcome chose the latter route when an exhaustive search, in the six months since the late Sir Alistair Frame retired, failed to find a suitable outsider.
The company is, however, ignoring the spirit of the legislation, and the preferences of many of its shareholders. Wellcome agreed with them as recently as three months ago. Its 1993 annual report states: 'The company remains committed to the principle of split roles and is actively seeking to appoint a chairman as soon as possible.'
Mr Robb is undoubtedly a very able manager who has improved the company dramatically since he became chief executive in 1990, when the top roles were split. It is a pity he should spoil that record by taking such a retrograde step.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments