View from City Road: Touche should test the regulators
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The lawsuit by Touche Ross against the Bank of England comes at a convenient time, just ahead of a creditors' meeting at Wembley on Thursday at which the liquidators will have to justify their own large bills to angry creditors.
If the case comes to court, it will test the responsibility of regulators in cases of gross frauds that happen under their noses, and define the limits of the Bank's immunity when it is operating under the 1987 Banking Act.
The report on the Bank's supervision of BCCI by Lord Justice Bingham built a picture of failures of supervision over many years which cumulatively caused a disaster, but it did not say there was gross negligence. Touche will have to prove there was.
The Bank is no stranger to lawsuits, having taken pounds 25m off Arthur Young in a settlement over the Johnson Matthey Bankers audit (driving the firm into a merger soon after). Touche would be failing the BCCI creditors if it did not have a go.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments