View from City Road: Too much red tape at the Exchange
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Michael Lawrence says he found the Stock Exchange too preoccupied with regulation and not enough with selling itself when he arrived a couple of months ago as chief executive. 'Eighty per cent of the talk around me is regulatory, not commercial. I don't think that is the right balance,' he complains. Mr Lawrence would prefer to cut the regulatory chat to 60 per cent.
Although he is sensibly bringing the exchange's regulatory functions under one boss, Mr Lawrence thinks too much agonising over regulation is bad for business.
He is dismissive of the Securities and Investments Board's recent report on securities market regulation, suggesting it covers much old ground while putting an unnecessary question mark over how well the London markets are regulated. 'I don't think London is badly regulated,' Mr Lawrence says. 'We shouldn't be fussing about trying to fix things that aren't broken.'
The London exchange is competing with other stock exchanges abroad for trading volumes and listings and, like any company, it will only survive if it produces good new products and markets itself effectively.
Regulation is important, but in a negative sense: if done well it is unnoticeable, but if expensive and cumbersome, customers go away.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments