View from City Road: Tiny foxes clever with control at Lonrho
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Dieter says it, Tiny does it. Lonrho is beginning to look as if it is succumbing to the power of Mr Bock, the German entrepreneur who is co-chief executive with Mr Rowland.
Selling the Observer, settling with the Fayeds, agreeing to rationalise the sprawling empire into four divisions and sell off hundreds of subsidiaries - all these are on Mr Bock's very public agenda, and are being achieved.
Meanwhile, Mr Bock's City fans ride along behind, cheering loudly as their hero chases the next fox. But are they watching through the wrong end of their binoculars? Could that be Mr Rowland hiding over there in the bushes, shooting Dieter's foxes before he gets to them? Look at how he pulled off the Fayed settlement without Mr Bock. He is making not dissimilar claims about the board's decision on a restructuring.
Mr Rowland is addressing two constituencies: members of his board and his shareholders. It does not really matter which co-chief executive first thought of these plans, as they are on the whole sensible and long overdue.
What does matter is that when it comes to a vote on the board - or if it gets out of hand, among shareholders - Mr Rowland will argue that he was always firmly in the driving seat, power should stay with him, and of course loyal allies will be rewarded. That real battle, over control, is still to come, and the outcome is far from a foregone conclusion.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments