View from City Road: Time to end PIA dallying
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE Treasury and the Bank of England should get off the fence, now the Securities and Investments Board has found a way around its earlier objections to welcoming the Personal Investment Authority.
The opportunity to simplify and possibly strengthen the regulatory regime has to be grabbed before it goes away. If the authorities delay much longer, the banks, building societies, fund managers and stockbrokers reluctant to join the PIA will feel free to continue as they are.
The arguments in favour of a single regulatory body covering all investments sold to individuals are overwhelming. It would help to turn the current jungle that is financial regulation into something approaching an orderly system. It might even result in tougher regulation, although that is not guaranteed by yesterday's consultative document, which was noticeably lacking in facts and figures.
Without the PIA, the future of independent financial advisers will again be in doubt, given the difficulty of financing a compensation scheme for them. And the future of self-regulation itself - already under pressure because of the Maxwell fallout - will come into question.
The Chancellor may, of course, have other things on his mind. But Anthony Nelson, the Economic Secretary, who is responsible for City regulation, should take time out to suuport the new body. He should persuade the life companies to relax their requirements and see if there is a way to comfort the banks and others so they join the PIA.
If he is successful, he should then turn his attention to sorting out wholesale regulation. But that is another story.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments