View from City Road: The pain of privatisation
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Stand by for indigestion. European stock markets are going to have to swallow privatisation issues worth up to dollars 150bn over the next five years. That, as the broker Morgan Stanley has pointed out, is almost three times as much as UK sell-offs have raised to date and represents 2.5 per cent of total EC gross domestic product.
Given the way governments in the West are increasingly turning to the bond markets to finance budget deficits, the stocks in question are going to have to taste good, especially since they will have to appeal to foreign preferences. Net investment by non nationals of dollars 12bn a year for the next three years will be required just to finance the capital requirements of France, Spain and Italy.
An uphill task, yet one which should be possible, thanks to the nature of the companies to be privatised. Up to a quarter of the stocks in question are likely to be telecommunications issues, with other utilities also heavily represented. Ensuring they are sufficiently profitable to have investors licking their lips should be a doddle. Lucky for governments; less lucky for the poor consumer.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments