Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

View from City Road: Regulators need sharper teeth

Wednesday 06 October 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The public wigging of the North of England Building Society shows what a toothless dog the Securities and Investments Board is. The North of England encouraged people to switch their money out of company pension schemes - which is rarely advisable - and to invest in with-profits bonds without a proper understanding of the risks.

Repeating the faults of several life insurance companies, North of England failed to control its financial consultants, who misled and mis-advised some 2,000 customers, the compensation of whom may well cost it pounds 500,000 this year.

But whereas Lautro, the life insurance regulator, has regularly imposed fines of more than pounds 100,000 on miscreants, SIB's powers restrict it to a 'public statement of contravention of rules and regulations'. This is just not good enough.

Andrew Large, SIB's chairman, has recognised the damage done by SIB's weakness as a regulator. He hopes that banks and building societies will join the Personal Investment Authority, the body planned to take on the job of safeguarding private investors. This would at least allow consistent punishment for similar offences.

But Mr Large's job is made no easier by the Treasury's reluctance to introduce new investor protection legislation. The Chancellor should recognise the weaknesses of the 1986 Financial Services Act, and bite the bullet. Britain's regulators need stronger laws.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in