View from City Road: Pearson coming up to the crossroads
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Half-time in the transformation of Pearson into a miniature News Corporation finds the budding multimedia group rather pleased with its performance, and not without some justification.
Costs continue to be cut with admirable vengeance. The demerger of Royal Doulton and the Camco sale have gone well, and left the group's core businesses looking coherent. They are putting in a creditable performance, and advertising revenues are looking up, albeit patchily.
Thames TV, the second-biggest supplier of programmes to ITV after Granada/LWT, looks to have been an astute buy. And BSkyB is beginning to offer the prospect of hitherto undreamt-of riches.
Against that must be weighed the embarrassment of having seen Rupert Murdoch snatch Star TV, the Asian satellite service, from under the group's nose. Yet that increasingly looks to have been a blessing in disguise. Star's fate is clearly to be determined by the approval (or otherwise) of a number of autocratic and dictatorial regimes - and by its ability to maximise revenues. Mr Murdoch's nimble feet may negotiate this minefield; whether Pearson could have done is doubtful.
Pearson has strong brands and, post-demergers, a more rational business mix. But many of its investments are opportunistic rather than synergistic. Sooner or later it will have to cash in passive holdings like BSkyB and either abandon or expand business areas where it is a relatively minor player, like regional newspapers.
There must be a limit to the waiting game, however, and when it comes, it will probably prove to be the resolution of the current review of cross-media ownership. A favourable solution would give Pearson the opportunity of growing non-print businesses to rival books and financial newspapers.
Change is at least 18 months away, though, so investors are in for a quiet period.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments