View from City Road: Past mistakes catch up with LIG
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It takes rare talent for a condom- maker to lose money in the middle of an Aids crisis, but London International Group made a basic error. In the 1980s the company expanded from condoms and surgical gloves, a business it knew well, into photo-processing, a business it knew little about.
There was little synergy. The group never developed a satisfying rationale for its diversification into such a highly cyclical area. While the good times rolled, the then management was apparently content to let its acquisition generate half its turnover and profits without really understanding what made the business tick.
As a result, the recession took LIG unawares. It meant less money around, fewer holidays, and fewer holiday snaps. In an industry with few entry barriers, it also meant overcapacity and a vicious price war.
LIG has taken more than three years to come to terms with its mistake and to realise that the companies most likely to make money out of processing are those, such as Kodak, which can exploit the advantages of vertical integration.
So the (mostly) new management team is going back to the non-cyclical area in which it can at least claim a technological edge, putting photo-processing up for sale. Job cuts and asset sales will pay for past hubris. Whether a buyer can be found (the balance- sheet value of the photo business is pounds 35m) is another question: outright closure could cost the group up to pounds 50m. A rights issue is the likeliest outcome and a powerful reason for avoiding the shares.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments