View from City Road: Outlook for water decidedly wet
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Nothing that water companies have said since Ofwat issued its discussion paper on the cost of capital in July 1991 seems to have budged the views of Ian Byatt, industry regulator. His proposal that the companies earn a real return of just 5 per cent on new investment is at the lower end of the tentative 5 to 6 per cent range put forward in 1991 and far away from the 9.5 per cent sought by the industry.
That is tough enough. But Ofwat is also insisting that any scope for real dividend increases from the core water businesses after 1995, when a new water pricing regime will be introduced, must come solely from efficiency gains.
The key point is that Ofwat will allow no free lunches in water pricing, beyond what is strictly needed to meet environmental requirements. Real dividend growth must come from diversification outside water. Only Wessex Water has succeeded in this task so far, a sobering thought for water investors.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments