View from City Road: Offset hides MFI's flop
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IN ANYBODY'S terminology, the flotation of MFI Furniture Group was a flop. Even with the shares at the discount price of 115p, the sub-underwriters ended up with 85 per cent of the shares on offer to the public.
So why were MFI's merchant bankers, County Natwest, claiming yesterday that 44 per cent of the offer was taken up and on Friday that it 'was not mega-undersubscribed'? Because 29 per cent of the shares have been subscribed for by sub-underwriters - institutional investors who agree to take up any shares left on the issuer's hands - in an offset deal.
The offset works like this. Sub-underwriters who definitely want to buy shares in a company being floated subscribe for the shares and this is subtracted from their sub- underwriting commitment on a pound-for- pound basis. However, they still receive their fee, equal to 1.25 per cent of the amount they underwrite. In MFI's case this means that institutional investors will receive pounds 571,000 for agreeing to buy shares which they wanted to buy anyway.
The whole thing seems like money for old rope. And it is. It also enables the merchant bank to present a rosier picture of an issue than it would have if the sub-underwriters had just received the shares in the normal fashion. County was fairly open about this yesterday, but N M Rothschild, which floated Anglian Windows last week, was initially not so forthcoming about the sub-underwriters' offset in its subscription figures.
The Office of Fair Trading is considering whether to make its investigation into underwriting more formal. The strange case of sub-underwriting offset should help it make up its mind.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments