Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

View from City Road: Life insurers must take the blame

Wednesday 08 December 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The life insurers' 'sell first, think later' philosophy is going to cost them dear once again. Accepting transfers from occupational pension schemes proved an easy sale during the recession, particularly with so many employees becoming early leavers because of redundancy.

Unfortunately, the Securities and Investment Board believes many people would have been better off leaving their money where it was. A pilot study suggests perhaps 150,000 of the 500,000 who have transferred their benefits, or opted out of their company pension scheme, have been badly advised. The cost of putting this right will run into hundreds of millions.

Let's assume pounds 500m and that the burden will be evenly spread across the life industry according to market share. This means Standard Life could be looking at a bill of pounds 55m, the much smaller NPI pounds 32m, and Legal & General pounds 31m. For mutual life offices, these are big sums to take away from their other policyholders.

The insurers say it is not all their fault. Company schemes should have provided better transfer values. They are not responsible for the advice given by independent advisers.

The insurers, though, are probably the only parties with any real money. If they failed to show the necessary caution and make the necessary checks before proceeding with such business, they have only themselves to blame.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in