Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

View from City Road: Greycoat tried to be too clever

Tuesday 06 July 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Geoffrey Wilson, chairman of Greycoat, is determined that shareholders should be under no illusions. Rejection of the restructuring proposals unveiled yesterday would put the group in jeopardy. Yet just seven months ago, Greycoat was insisting it could pay its bills and had positive net worth.

The difference now, according to Mr Wilson, is that values have suffered an unprecedented and prolonged drop. But surely they have not continued downwards throughout the last seven months? With 75 per cent of its portfolio in three well-let buildings in prime locations - exactly the properties that have now started to rise in value - it should have been able to ride out the slump. In fact, its problems stem from too- clever financing, which assumed that rents would carry on soaring.

The biggest risk of dissension about yesterday's deal must come from the holders of the pounds 50m preference shares, who are not being offered any compensation, despite being asked to waive their dividends and take a 60 per cent drop in nominal value. Until the detailed accounts and asset valuations are available, ordinary shareholders can only hope that the proposals ensure there will be something left for them. Certainly, no decision on taking up the rights can be made until then.

Postel clearly believes that the deal allows it to get some good quality property on the cheap. It is keen to add to its property holdings but, with virtually every other British institution thinking the same, competition has forced prices in the open market up higher than it was prepared to pay. Now that Hammerson has sorted itself out through a rights issue, Greycoat was the sole opportunity to buy well-let properties at a discount through corporate activity. Other companies are either at a premium to net assets or sitting on floors of empty space.

Whether the deal is as good as it seems depends on the asset valuation, which will not be revealed for about six weeks. The fact that Greycoat's portfolio is largely let makes its position unique and other struggling property companies should not wait to be bailed out by friendly institutions.

Greycoat is also one of the few remaining small property companies still paying its directors handsomely. Given the well publicised views on salaries held by Alastair Ross Goobey, Postel's chief executive, shareholders can at least hope for some economies there.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in