View from City Road: Greycoat alternative is receivership
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Its amazing what a bit of bribery will do. Judging by the 3.5p rise in Greycoat's preference shares yesterday, the offer of up to a 20 per cent stake in the company in exchange for a cut in nominal value will be enough to persuade the holders to lie down and play dead. But for every winner there is a loser, and here it is clearly the ordinary shareholders.
After the pref holders take their cut, and the UK Active Value Fund and its sub-underwriting circle have exercised their warrants, they could be left with as little as 65 per cent of the company - assuming they take up their rights. The rights issue requires them to cough up for five new shares for every one held, instead of four under the Postel plan. The pain is clear from the fact that the current proposal will leave an asset value of 14.8p a share compared with 16p under the previous offer.
Ordinary shareholders could now decide to scupper the alternative. But that would trigger immediate default proceedings. Given that no other offer has emerged in the month since the Postel plan was rejected, the warning by Geoffrey Wilson, Greycoat's chairman, that the alternative is receivership looks credible.
With debts of pounds 240m on net assets of just pounds 140m, there is some way to go before the company looks healthy again. Ordinary dividends are some way off and it is likely that Embankment Place will have to be sold if the company is to achieve its ambition of developing some of its sites.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments