View from City Road: Good news, but not for all names
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Yesterday was a good day for the thousands of Lloyd's names pursuing their losses in the courts.
The House of Lords, dismissing an appeal, finally confirmed that members' agents are contractually liable for negligent underwriting by Lloyd's syndicates. And, in a separate action, the High Court ruled that agents are also liable if they place their names on inappropriate syndicates, involving greater risks than their clients anticipated.
Establishing these principles will give hope to many impoverished members of Lloyd's.
But it is not a let-off for the market as a whole. The assets of the members' agents themselves would scarcely make a dent in losses that run into billions. Most of the cash will have to come from the agents' errors and omissions insurance which, to a very large extent, is provided by Lloyd's insurance syndicates - and the names that belong to them.
Neither is it a let-off for the Gooda Walker names, who face enormous legal bills and a long and expensive fight to show they were the victims of negligence. Lawyers are still set to be among the biggest beneficiaries of the court actions. There was a lot wrong with the spurned compensation offer from Lloyd's, but it might yet be shown to have been the better path.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments