Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

View from City Road: Good intentions, doubtful results

Wednesday 14 October 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SIR Peter Thompson, chairman of Proshare, the body that is trying to promote wider share ownership, thinks that many small investors holding shares will increase liquidity in the stock market. Like most of the ideas of the Proshare Association, which was launched yesterday, this is laudable in intention but does not translate well into reality.

For pounds 30 a year, a small investor joining the Proshare Association receives a newsletter, a guide to investment in instalments (rather like those DIY or cookbook series where you risk missing the crucial volume seven) and an invitation to a 30-minute session with a stockbroker, who will advise the member on the best way to invest his or her money. One might surmise that most stockbrokers will advise the investor to buy shares, though Proshare claims this will not always be the case.

Proshare recommends that investors spread their risks through portfolios of shares. But Sir Peter's example, given at the launch, of someone investing pounds 2,000 in eight or nine shares ignores the fact that this person will lose nearly a tenth of that money in dealing charges before he or she starts. Given the high cost of dealing, Proshare's advocacy of investing relatively small sums in individual stocks, as opposed to collective investments like unit or investment trusts, is ill-conceived.

Geoffrey Maddrell, Proshare's chief executive, says investors should hold for the long term - he suggests 10 or 20 years. But even if all the 100,000 investors Proshare expects to attract buy 10 shares each and hold them for 10 years, it will not affect liquidity in small stocks by a significant amount. More thought needed, alas, Sir Peter.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in