Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

View from City Road: Goldman move calls for guesswork

Friday 26 August 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Punting on the bond or stock markets for its own account (proprietary trading) is one thing; but to see New York's pre-eminent investment bank metamorphosing into an entrepreneurial investor in the glamorous world of high fashion and multimedia is quite another.

Why should an investment bank such as Goldman Sachs want to become an active shareholder in the likes of Polo Ralph Lauren, the fashion house, for which it has just paid dollars 135m for a 28 per cent stake, or the near-bankrupt German television station Vox, in which it appears to be poised to take a 25 per cent holding? Since Goldman seems determined not to explain its reasoning, it is only possible to speculate.

The Lauren holding seems at first sight terminally illiquid; Ralph Lauren, the eponymous founder of Polo Ralph Lauren, and his deputy, Peter Strom, own the rest of the group's shares. They have repeatedly said they do not intend to float the group, offering Goldman no easy exit for its investment. And Vox's shareholders will need considerable reserves of energy and money, as well as the right global broadcasting connections, if the troubled station is to survive. Neither sounds like the typical terrain of cautious, return-driven, investment bankers.

Unless, of course, such holdings are a means to more mainstream banking ends. New York fashion houses are increasingly big corporations in need of lucrative advice on raising money and such like - the Lauren business would probably have a market capitalisation well in excess of dollars 500m. And their owners have the sort of glitzy social connections bankers find invaluable in drumming up business: when a vice-president of Goldman married a design manager from Lauren last year, it made the social pages of the New York Times.

Vox, too, has its uses. It is easy to see why Vox's other shareholders would welcome Goldman on board. Both Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation, with almost 50 per cent of Vox, and Bertelsmann, the German media group with just under 25 per cent, are prevented by media ownership rules from increasing their stakes, but need to find friendly hands for the rest of the equity, held in trust pending a long-term shareholder.

Mr Murdoch, like Mr Lauren, is a potentially highly valuable client - the more so now that News Corp is Australia's most profitable company, and BSkyB, in which News has a half- stake, is seen as a candidate for a pounds 4.5bn-plus flotation.

Goldman has made a big pitch to dominate the media sector in the US and Europe. It offers mouth-watering fee opportunities with the coming of cable, satellite and multimedia. In London, top-rated analysts such as Neil Blackley and Guy Lamming have been brought in. Mr Murdoch is potentially one of the sector's biggest players; small wonder if Goldman should want to keep him sweet. Not that this would be its first media investment; Goldman also owns most of Diamond Cable, Britain's 12th-biggest franchise owner.

Other recent examples abound of investment banks helping their clients with more than just advice. Recently, Schroders, the bankers, took a 50 per cent stake in a radio company alongside Emap, its publishing client. That scheme involved Schroders in no financial risk and was designed by the bank purely to finesse the radio ownership rules.

Whether those are Goldman's limited ambitions in the case of Vox remains to be seen.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in