View from City Road: Generating a lot of bafflement
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Like an optimist who thinks a bottle is half-full and a pessimist who is convinced that it is half- empty, PowerGen and National Power, its bigger rival UK electricity generator, disagree about the future.
Last week National Power was wringing its hands, warning of uncertain times because it had secured contracts with the regional electricity companies for only half of its likely output over the next five years.
Yesterday PowerGen, which has also signed contracts for half its output, declared that, as a result, the uncertainty it had highlighted when the company was privatised had been 'satisfactorily overcome'.
Confused? More baffling still is dividend policy. A pessimistic National Power increased its dividend by 16 per cent after a 13 per cent increase in pre-tax profits. PowerGen, radiating sunny optimism, lifted its payout by only 13.5 per cent after an 18 per cent profits rise.
Perhaps the managements want to show that the two companies are not Tweedledum and Tweedledee. Certainly PowerGen has been much more aggressive on new gas power station building, which could help narrow the size gap between it and National Power. PowerGen is much less committed to diversifying into overseas electricity markets.
Ultimately, it is dividend growth that counts. Having slashed their workforces in half since privatisation both companies now plan to rely more on reducing dividend cover to produce double-digit payout growth in the next three years.
A yield of 3.6 per cent at PowerGen compared with 3.8 per cent at National Power shows that people prefer an optimist. But dividend growth of more than 10 per cent will not be so rare as cyclical recovery companies get into their stride in the next year or so. Better returns should be generated elsewhere.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments